Friday, May 15, 2015

The Rational Feminist Unicorn

After five years of carefully and cautiously - okay, perhaps not that cautiously - but deliberately attempting to elicit a reasonable, rational response from feminism to the issues of the Manosphere, I may have finally found my unicorn.


Here's the backstory: I occasionally indulge in some friendly Twitter engagement with feminists, taking a strong anti-feminist position.  I'm openly and un-apologetically acting as an agent provocateur, Understand, while this may be seen as trolling, I am extremely polite in my engagements with feminists and never cross the line into "bullying".  That doesn't mean that some don't get hurt feelings, but in most cases that was a pre-existing condition.

Now, while many of you will shake your heads over the utility or the practicality of attempting such engagement, I do so for higher purpose, not just because I like yanking pigtails.  I'm not there to make feminists mad, I'm there to challenge and give honest criticism, to make them think more than to make them angry.  I'm laying out, in as practical and simple terms as I can, why the Manosphere and men in general have taken issue with feminism, as it has presented itself.  I've done this over and over again, searching for a unicorn: a feminist who is willing to look past the rhetoric of the feminist movement and address the issues with it that men and the Manosphere have.

Why would I want to do such a perverse thing?  While it would be much easier to just hurl mindless vitriol, as I said, I'm not into yanking pigtails for fun.  My goal is to actually open some sort of reasonable dialog between the two spheres.

So, after responding to a fairly reasonable post by a young feminist woman who was confused and upset by the anger she detected from the anti-feminist movement on the #HowToSpotAFeminist hashtag which started to get meme-y (and then posting my reply to as many retweeters of the original as I could find) a bold feminist unicorn stood forth from the herd, and responded on her blog.

To avoid any miscommunication, I'd like to reprint her post in its entirety before I respond:

Hi Ian,
thanks for your thoughtful response! I appreciate your civil discourse and lack of ad hominem attacks. Seriously. 
Due to your lack of actual citation beyond the link to a blog post that itself looks at largely anecdotal data, I will also respond using broad strokes and summaries. I can provide factual citation and data from research on historical trends from non-biased sources as requested, if necessary. Also, while gender and sexuality are multivariate, not binary, in order to most directly and efficiently respond to your letter, I will mostly be talking about feminism in largely binary terms. 
So, I see your hurt feelings. They are true and valid. I will not dispute that they exist. However, I think that there’s some conflation going on assigning causality in incorrect ways. I am not saying that nothing was done, or that no one did anything. Things were done. People did them. But from where I’m standing, there’s been some conflation of separate entities in what all went down. 
Yes, feminism has pointed out that there are issues that exist with men, masculinity, fatherhood, and male sexuality. It has not, however, said that those categories are the issues. They have the issues. And lots of those issues have affected women at a systemic and subsequently individual level. Yes, women, femininity, motherhood, and female sexuality also have issues. And those issues have affected men on a systemic and subsequently individual level. But feminism posits, with the whole of history that I won’t repeat here to back it up, that men’s issues have had the harder hit, when it comes to the way society has shown bruises. The phrase “it’s a man’s world” is an incredibly crude phrase, but it is a good summary of what the main problem throughout history has boiled down to. 
You say that feminism has not been inclusive of men’s issues. I say that this is an unfair critique. Every activist movement only has so many resources to go around. You wouldn’t criticize a puppy rescue for not seeing to the homeless kittens out there, too. It’s not their scope. Do they care about kittens? Yes. Do they want organizations to exist to get the kittens help? Yes. Do they think that by addressing the cause of homeless pets while working specifically with the target population of puppies their work will also help kittens? Yes. When they go out to the public to talk about their mission, are they going to use their limited time and resources to talk about kittens? No. Feminism works on the overall condition of human rights by focusing on a target dynamic. We think men and their plights are important too. We’re just not that organization. 
Finally, there is the important distinction between “the actions of an individual who claims a label” and “the definition of the label itself.” A person can claim that they are a certain thing, and then act in no such manner. It’s been the recognized case with religion for years. People claiming to be Christian and to believe in love and forgiveness have gone and slaughtered millions in crusades and KKK rallies and abortion clinic bombings. Were those actions produced by Christianity? No. They were actions produced by angry individuals who falsely claimed the nearest convenient label as a justification for their own independent action. 
Feminism is not about taking advantage of or attacking men. Feminism is in fact exactly the opposite, about righting a systemic abuse of power to bring us all back to a playing field of being reasonable, decent humans to each other who don’t make assumptions based on stereotypes, whether about males or females. The actions of not-actually-feminists only “stain” the movement as much as the action of male rapists and serial killers and bigots and otherwise terrible humans “stain” the whole of manhood.
As Katherine mentions in her blog post, true feminism does not discount subsets of feminist interests. Women are allowed to want to be mothers and wives and mascara-appliers and hair-doers and skirt-wearers. They are allowed to care about their high heels and children. That is fine. Acceptable. Laudable. As is not wanting to be a wife or a mother or to wear makeup or do anything remotely similar. Or, to be a male and to want to be a husband and father and to wear makeup and do hair and wear skirts. Or, to be someone who falls in none of those categories. Feminism is the idea that boxes are idiotic, and no one should be trapped in them – or outside of them. 
You say my idea of feminism is naïve, but I would counter that perhaps your experience of it is limited. I do not deny that there are angry people out there calling themselves feminists and acting the opposite. They are visible. They are loud. They are really quite noticeable. Yes, they exist. But feminists who are reasonable and don’t go gutting others in the style of exactly what we’re trying to end exist, too. The “warm, happy, sunny feminism” you claim I know because I practice it, or at least try my damnedest to. Katherine does as well. There are others – women and men – in my day to day life who practice it, too. I see them. I know they are real. I’m sorry people like them apparently don’t exist in your personal world. Though when presented with two people – one who’s smiling at you and the other who’s about to stab you with a knife – I can understand how the knife-wielder might take more precedence in what you’re remembering came at you that day. I promise there are more of smilers out there, somewhere around you. 
But don’t get me wrong – people who are good feminists, are decent humans are allowed to get angry, too. Just like you, we’re allowed to feel hurt at our own knife wounds. And we’re allowed to fight back. Just as you are.
Best,
Miceala Shocklee



Dear Miceala:

Thank you for your polite and civil response.  I do try to avoid ad hominem language, even if my language is often considered caustic, because the fact is my issue is with the feminist movement and a few particular leaders more than it is with individual feminists.  My purpose has always been to arouse discussion, not foster an environment of hate.  So your civil and reasonable response to my posting is very, very much appreciated.

I'll begin by saying that I avoided actual citation and stuck to generalities on purpose, to avoid getting entangled in dueling statistics.  Thanks to the internet, citing stats and studies and then undermining their worthiness has become an artform, one which rarely accomplishes anything.  I am trying to discuss the inter-gender situation in general, so I appreciate you keeping your response equally high-level.

First, let me thank you for acknowledging the validity of our feelings.  That's bigger than you know.  Men in the Manosphere (for our purposes, the combined MHRM/MGTOW/PUA/OMG and other advocates of positive masculinity) frequently express their strong emotions and feelings, though with varying degrees of eloquence.  These expressions, ironically, are largely due to an upbringing in which we were encouraged by feminism to "express our feelings" instead of bottling them up in traditional masculine Stoic (and, according to feminism, "unhealthy") fashion.

now those expressions of genuine feeling, when expressed about feminism, are used against us.  To feminism-at-large we are "bitter, whiny, angry, frustrated men consumed with rage".  Rarely is the question of whether or not our feelings are valid and justified considered by feminism - it uses our bitterness as proof of our "toxicity", not as a token of our righteous anger.  Instead, the emotions that feminism encouraged us to share, back in our youth, are now being used to shame and denigrate us because we dare share them.  So your acknowledgement of their validity is refreshing, and I do genuinely appreciate it.

I can also appreciate your frustration with the Manosphere/anti-feminists consistently finding fault with an ideology that you have invested so much in, and that you see as being responsible for so much good in the world.  Your point about conflation of causality is well-taken . . . but then when it comes to the details, that's where things start being a problem.

You agree that stuff was done, and people did them. That's a good start - too often feminists are unwilling to even admit that feminism has caused harm because of their investment in the ideology.  I'll agree that the specifics are open to debate, but the very fact you admit stuff was done and something went down is a HUGE step . . . because feminism has been very, very reluctant to take responsibility for what the feminist movement has done. The specifics, you see, are very important.

When feminism began to critically examine the the role of men in the late 1960s-1970s, I think we can all admit that some serious examination was necessary: the economy and society of the world had changed with industrialization, and our social system had to adapt to keep up.  Moving forward into a post-industrial age in which women and men could both compete in the labor marketplace required some dramatic and frightening changes to our agrarian-oriented society.  Technological innovations like the birth control pill fundamentally altered how human sexuality functioned, and our culture, our laws, and our society did, indeed, need the first two rounds of feminism like a shot of antibiotics.

Keep that in mind: despite the churning anger of the Manosphere, the vast majority of men involved do not, as feminism accuses us, want to curtail the basic gains made in women's rights and women's empowerment.  By and large we don't want to restrict women's rights to vote, hold office, own property, or compete on an equal footing in the workplace.  The vast, vast majority of men in the Manosphere and in the anti-feminist movement approach their activism with a humanistic perspective that has no desire to undercut the equal rights of women.

When feminism examined the issues of "toxic" masculinity in the 1970s, it didn't stop at a mere critique; it unilaterally decided on a reconstruction.  Fatherhood, masculinity, men, and male sexuality were not only put under the microscope by feminism, to the vast majority of men it felt as if we were going under the knife.  Traditional refuges of masculinity were attacked and criticized by feminism without understanding of their utility and usefulness to men, or the long-term effects of their assault on our society.  In the pursuit of gender-based justice, feminism threw men and masculinity under the bus.

I can appreciate your point that both men and women have issues - but the difference is that feminism has cultivated a climate in which women are allowed to comment on male issues and women's issues, but the moment that men voice an honest opinion about either they are attacked without consideration.  And while I can also appreciate that, in feminism's perspective, that men seem to have gotten away with an awful lot of masculine "privilege", that belies the truth of our own perspective.  For millions of men over hundreds of years, their "male privilege" began and ended on the battlefield, while women were largely protected by their sacrifice.

When feminism speaks of equality, which it does often as a fundamental ideal, it assumes that the social and legal dynamic places men in a "higher" class than women institutionally, that men enjoy "more" rights than women, and that women must therefore "equalize" our institutions to correct this imbalance.  Yet rarely, if ever, does feminism appreciate the large number of gender-based masculine obligations, both legal and social, that men incur as a penalty for our sex.  In other words, while the rights to vote and sit on a jury and have a credit card are necessary for a woman's equality in our society, then logically the duty to register for conscription and the willingness to sacrifice your life for your society and nation are two profound areas in which men and women remain glaringly unequal.

Feminism has always ignored the profound effect this existential threat holds over men; when the subject is brought up it is dismissed either by denying the importance of an archaic institution only intended to serve in direst emergency, or the evils of conscription are thoughtfully acknowledged with a shrug of feminist shoulders and an occasional finger pointed at "the patriarchy".  Yet when it comes to defining our gendered experience, the solemn fact is that women are protected from this specter by the virtue of their gender in a very un-equal way . . . while men are still expected - even by feminists - to be the first to sacrifice their lives and their interests for the sake of the greater (largely feminine) good.

I can appreciate the frustration implicit in such foreboding sayings as "It's A Man's World", and how that seems like a near-insurmountable challenge for women.  Yet while that phrase is easy to employ, rarely does feminism stop to give consideration of just what this "Man's World" has accomplished, or appreciate the breathtaking achievements masculine ingenuity and inventiveness have wrought on behalf of all of humanity.

This "Man's World" feminism rails against gave us the industrialization that allowed women to earn their own incomes; it gave us advanced medicine and technology to reduce or eliminate problems women have complained about for literally thousands of years; it has reduced infant mortality and increased life expectancy, ensured food security and provided physical security, and granted the women of our time a standard of living not even monarchs could boast of two hundred years ago.

When feminism attacks the "Man's World", it is also attacking all of those things.  It is attacking the social welfare system, the social and legal institutions we men established, and the underlying masculine pride we men rightly feel in what our ancestors accomplished in building our great civilization.  Feminism has successfully demonized the legacy of men who toiled and gave their lives to build the society in which they live and thrive.  It has reduced the breathtaking explosion of masculine achievement and ingenuity that has transformed our culture since the industrial revolution to a handful of imperialistic overlords and despotic oppressors.  Feminism has, in other words, fostered and encouraged an environment in which masculine perspectives are at best untrusted, and at worst actively challenged.

Your point about feminism lacking room or energy for pursuing "men's issues" is well-taken. Yet advocating for equality for one side of the equation without consideration of the other is inherently frustrating.  Unfortunately, feminism has not just ignored men's issues in the past, oftentimes it has actively worked against them, and the hard-working, dedicated men who are trying to bring them to light on their own.  Many of us in the Manosphere were, at one time or another, affiliated with feminists and feminism, and when these issues with pursuing true equality were brought up, we were told smugly "sure, go start your own movement, then!" with a matronizing grin.  In the face of feminism's indifference to our issues, that's exactly what we did.  You wouldn't rescue puppies, so we started rescuing puppies.

The MHRM is the result.  Yet feminists regularly blast this network of organizations and its activities (pursuing basic equal human rights for men) regularly and repeatedly . . . on the basis of your claim that men's issues have had "the harder hit".  The perception of historical "oppression" by men has allowed feminism to rationalize such radical notions as enforced male sterility and male genocide without criticism.  I admit, these are radical voices of an increasingly radicalized movement, and hardly representative of the feelings of feminists overall . . . yet these voices are not only uncriticized and left unjudged by feminism in general, the authors of these horrific ideas are celebrated and touted for their advanced thinking.  The crimes of the Manosphere may be many, but advocating genocide among women is not one of them.

When men attempt to go rescue our puppies, feminism has consistently tried to cut us down.  When Warren Farrell, originally a member of the feminist movement, dared to criticize some of feminism's fundamental concepts, he was ostracized from the movement and denigrated.  Now one of the leading figures of the Men's Human Rights Movement, he is regularly attacked by feminists for the crime of suggesting that maybe men suffer from inequality in some important ways, too.  When feminists attack shared parenting initiatives or advocate for lighter sentencing for female criminals, using a "patriarchal society" as their straw man, they not only undercut their stated dedication to equality by demonstrably working against it, they profoundly alienate otherwise reasonable men who are passionately advocating for their human rights away from feminism's stated goals.

We understand you "aren't that organization".  But the issue of, believe it or not, equality comes to the fore.  Feminism regularly beseeches society at large (which is made up half of men) to pay attention to feminism issues and the plight of women and girls all over the world.  But when the MHRM attempts to call attention in return to the plight of men and boys, feminism attacks us for attempting to steal their thunder.  Pleading with us for change and understanding, on the one hand, and then refusing to even listen, much less improve your understanding, on the other is a very poor way to solicit the meaningful cooperation of men.

I can also understand your desire to distance yourself from the radical positions and proposals that Third and Fourth Wave feminism have inflicted on men.  You ask that we not conflate the imperfect actions of some individuals with the noble ideals of an entire movement.  The common summation of this position is "Not All Feminists Are Like That".  You ask for us, as men, to accept the ideals of equality and ignore the hurtful, hateful speech directed at us for forty years by your radical wing.  You ask us to sacrifice our interests and issues for the greater good of social equality, while allowing your self-labeled sisters to call us rapists and violent psychopaths to our faces.  You ask us to ignore the hateful language of those who feel entitled to accuse us unjustly, and then help you create a "better" world.  Seeing the individuals - folks like Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti - as representative of all feminists is unfair, you seem to say.  Yet just as only a tiny minority of male rapists has succeeded in tarnishing the good name of male sexuality for all men, these aggressively vitriolic heralds who claim to be feminists have seriously tarnished any hope of us men seeing the feminist label, no matter how lofty its ideals, as anything but a brand by which we are being savaged.

Your perspective on feminism's goals and ideals is noble . . . but the execution has indeed both taken advantage of and attacked men as a natural social and cultural consequence of its ideals.  While insisting on the goal of a world without damaging stereotypes, feminism itself propagates the most damaging kinds of stereotypes about men.  You ask us to use our judgement about just who the "real" feminists are, after calling our collective judgement into question for forty years and demanding that men have no role in determining women's self-image, interests, or issues.  Plenty of men in the Manosphere strongly and profoundly condemn the rapists and murderers among us as a natural course of instinctive masculine protection of our society, but even mild criticism of the not-actually-feminists by the "real" feminists is thin on the ground.

Our issue isn't necessarily with what women want to do with themselves and their lives - but the insistence that you do so without fear of consequence or criticism from us is unreasonable.  The lives of men are inextricable interwoven with those of women, and your choices, your decisions effect us intimately, whether you are our mothers, our sisters, our girlfriends, our wives, or our co-workers.  While it might seem of only academic interest to feminism what individual women do with those choices, it is of very real interest to the individual men who must contend with them.  It's not about whether or not you want to become corporate powerhouses or domestic goddesses; it's about which of those we're more comfortable associating with, and which we prefer to pursue romantically.

Feminism is great about advocating for men and boys to become more feminine in their outlook, but it punishes us when we try to exercise our inherent masculinity.  Yes, it's fine if boys want to stay home and be house-husbands . . . but the fact of the matter is that not only is that almost entirely untenable for a man in our society to do so, but when given a preference most men want to pursue more traditionally masculine pursuits and activities, not become househusbands . . . for which we are castigated.

Feminism's willful ignorance of masculinity's interests and issues projects common female concerns onto men in the mistaken belief that our goals and aspirations are equal.  They are not.  They are very different.  Little boys don't want to grow up to be househusbands because they're being poisoned by the patriarchy with toxic masculinity . . . they don't want to grow up to be househusbands because they see the disrespect and condemnation that such men receive not from their fellow men, but from the women around them.  This has not changed in forty years of feminist activism.  For while feminism will fight to the death for a boy's right to cry out his feelings, it goes up in arms when that same boy wants to invest in his masculinity in ways that is not in service to women.  Feminism has attempted to ignore the very real factor of intersexual and intrasexual competition, and as a result the personal lives of millions of men have suffered because our natural masculine inclinations are viewed as uniformly toxic.

I would have to counter that my experience with feminists and feminism isn't limited - I spent six years in an environment of academic feminism, and continued to support feminist-oriented causes and activism for years.  I know literally thousands of feminists, from Old Guard 2nd-Wave Equity Feminists to Radical 3rd Wave Riot Grrls, moderates, radicals, intersectionalists, Marxist feminists, and every shade in between.  My problem is not too little exposure to feminism, but such a grand exposure that I have seen up close and personal it's inherent flaws and failings.

The fact is, plenty of "sunny, happy feminists" exist in my world. And they are part of the problem.  Not because their intentions or ideals are in error - they're good people, trying to make the world better the way they've been taught to.  But because their intentions and ideals are not fulfilled by their actions and activism.  Standing firm behind the inherently misandric concepts of "patriarchy", "rape culture", and "misogyny" while the vocal component of your movement uses them as weapons to actively shame and emasculate all men means that you are providing political and social cover for folks who are stomping all over the ideal of equality . . . and we're watching you do it.  While you were smiling at us, assuring us that you were not a threat, the radicals have been hiding behind you and stabbing us repeatedly while you watch them do it.  Would you trust a voice who endorsed that?

In the end, the issue is one of accountability.  Feminism's goals and ideals are lofty, but as they have been executed they have caused incredible damage to men that feminism - and feminists - are unwilling to be accountable for.  More, despite your assurances about labels, feminism has regularly and routinely savaged women who disagreed with them and viciously attacked their decisions.  Pretending that all feminists (or even a majority of feminists) think its equally acceptable and valid for a woman to choose whichever path she likes belies the thousands of articles from within feminism's own ranks which prove otherwise.  Women who marry early, don't go to college, and condescend to devote their lives to their husbands and families are frequently harassed and demeaned by the feminist narrative.  Motherhood and domesticity - hallmarks of femininity and parts of the essential self-image of women for thousands of years - are regularly debased as unimportant by feminists, scalding the millions of women women who decided their reproductive future was more important than their career future.

But feminism won't own its own savaging of women.  It won't own the millions of men who have suffered because of feminist-inspired culture of serial monogamy and divorce.  It won't own the blatantly unfair and unequal treatment it has given fathers over the years, the cynical attacks on fatherood and father's rights.  It won't own the reality of false rape accusations, because the supposed effect on the alleged victims far outweighs the legal and moral rights of anyone accused of a crime to due process.  It won't own the millions of families shattered by the feminist movement's unintended consequences.  Or the dramatic social and cultural impact feminist initiatives and programs have had on men and children.

So regardless of the smiles, we see far more knives . . . and even one knife is too many.  After forty years of relentlessly using men and masculinity as a punching bag without fear of serious consequence, the result is what you see before you: two generations of men confused, angry, bitter, and nearly hopeless about our futures.  Being lambasted for our male privileges while 70% of homeless and suicide victims are men galls us.  Being accused of perpetrating "rape culture" while the majority of us have been so heartlessly attacked for our sexuality that some of our best minds consider chemical castration and self-imposed exile from the gene pool because of the terror feminism has inspired in men about sex is insulting.  Feminism has succeeded in nearly criminalizing and certainly demonizing normal, healthy male sexuality - and undermining the social stability of family life and long term monogamy that men have been traditionally dependent upon for our motivations.

If feminism is to be true to its ideals and pursue a culture of equality, not only can it not do so without taking the issues and interests of men into consideration, it will never happen without the active and enthusiastic cooperation of men.  Using shame, ridicule, disrespect and outright antipathy to motivate us just doesn't work. In fact, it produces things like the Manosphere as a direct result.

Nor are we as "fringe" as you might imagine.  Over the course of the last several years the Manosphere has exploded, thanks to information technologies, and part of our continuing efforts involve educating young men and boys about our perspectives on feminism.  And it's catching on.

 We are purposefully - out of sheer desperation - doing our best to inoculate young men from feminism and demonstrate that feminist perspectives do not have their best interests in mind.  We are encouraging them not to marry, and when they do, to have ridiculously high standards for their wives.  We are encouraging them to pursue their natural masculine goals and interests without regard to the concerns of women.  We are encouraging them to reject women with a high partner count as poor long-term risks for matrimony, but good short-term prospects for sex.  We are teaching them to be more callous and calculating in their personal choices because in our collective experience it is the attitude that will serve them best in this environment.  We are teaching them that there are enough women in the world to consider for sex and dating that becoming reliant on any one is a poor idea.  We are teaching them that girls are not their friends, but their competitors and sex interests alone . . . because we've seen how women treat their male "friends".

I know, all of these things will horrify your average feminist.  But just as the radical wing of the 3rd Wave (Dworkin, McKinnion, et. al.) saw the cautious attempts of men in the 1970s to contend with feminism as proof of the inherent "male oppression" that justified thirty years of misandry in the feminist movement, as reasonable men we look at the future that our sons have, and we don't want them to experience the same hateful and hopeless dance with feminism we were forced into.

Instead, we will teach them to be masculine Men, according to their own desires and needs.  Which includes a healthy amount of male sexuality.  Yes, getting laid is a primary male interest.  So, ironically, is getting married.  So is having children.  But the days when a man could safely count on good opportunities for all three of those are over, and we have to teach our sons how to deal with the world they will live in, not the ideal we want for them.

So we're telling them to drop out.  Drop out of college, turn their back on corporate achievement, and withdraw their active support and energy from society until feminism relents and decides to actually talk to us, not merely scream at us.  We're telling them to withdraw their participation and focus solely on their own well-being.  We're establishing the meme that a man who works on a woman's behalf has betrayed his self-interest and that of his fellow men.  We're telling our boys that feminism is a foe, that women are all suspect, and that they should have fear and suspicion in their hearts when approaching the topic . . . because any other perspective for men in a post-feminist world is not going to be in his best interests.

It's sad, it really is.  But this is not the world we wrought - this is the world that feminism gave to us.  Our mothers were divorced and bitter, our fathers were estranged and disrespected, and you've tried to make us feel ashamed of our masculinity for so long, we just don't trust you any more.  Every time we do, we get hurt - it's like an abusive relationship.  It will take a lot of effort and a lot of energy to reconcile these perspectives, I know.  And yes, that might be easier to do if men and the Manosphere would take a more conciliatory, less-caustic tone.

But the problem is we tried doing that in nice respectful language for forty years, and you ignored us and humiliated us.  We CAN'T trust feminism any more, and we HAVE to treat it with suspicion, because it's clear that the future it wants for men is not one that men want for themselves.

I hope this inspires you to continue the dialog, and I invite your thoughtful response.  But if it follows the usual pattern of our discourse with feminism, you will likely shrug your shoulders, write us off, and ignore what we've been saying while you go rescue another kitten.  That's your prerogative, of course.  But don't say we didn't try.

Very Best Wishes,

Ian Ironwood























75 comments:

  1. Ian, I've been following your presence online for quite some time now. I looooveee your work so much. Every essay is informative and you (and the rest of the manosphere) have slowly managed to drain the bluepill out of me. For this i'm eternally grateful.

    Because of my gratitude towards you, I feel that it's my duty to inform an injustice happening on the internet. A dastardly website called the Kiwi Farms has been following the manosphere (and you) for quite some time.

    Your Page
    https://kiwifar.ms/threads/the-red-pill-room-ian-ironwood-an-exceptional-intellectual.9087/

    Thier loveshy subforum
    https://kiwifar.ms/forums/loveshy-therapy-center.60/

    They ran me off the website when I tried to defend another of their redpill hate targets, I reasoned the best I could but they used cheap feminist strawmen on me. I'm not the best with words you see. Any chance you could set them straight? They're intellectual lightweights and with your excellent writing skills can take them down quickly!

    The redpill owes you so much.

    My regards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Boobs And Pusssy Pictures & Video of Indian,Tamil And Pakistani Girls


      Indian College Girls Pissing Hidden Cam Video in College Hostel Toilets


      Indian Girl Night Club Sex Party Group Sex


      Indian Boy Lucky Blowjob By Mature Aunty


      Desi Indian Naked Girls Big Boobs And Hairy Pussy Pics


      Priyanka Chopra Full Nude Sex Photos And Boobs


      Beautiful Young Indian Girl Nude Photo Album


      Priyanka Chopra Hot Bed Room Kissing scene And Sex Photos


      Pakistani Local Girls Hot,cool,sexy photos


      Cute And Sexy Wet Indian College Girl In Swimming Pool


      Hottest Actress Katrina Kaif's Boob Press In Party Shocking Real Picture


      Indian Girls Nude Photos With Nice Boobs And Pussy


      Priyanka Chopra Hot Bed Room Kissing scene And Sex Photos


      Boobs And Pusssy Pictures of Indian And Pakistani Girl


      Young Indian College Teen Girl Posing Nude Showing Juicy Tits and Shaved Pussy Pics


      Porn Star Sunny Leone Fresh Fucking Pictures


      Indian Pornstars Nude Photos


      Indian Hot Models Real Leaked Nude Photos


      Priyanka Chopra Full Nude Sex Photos And Boobs


      Sania Mirza Most Sexiest Pictures And Boobs


      Pakistani Local Girls Hot,cool,sexy photos


      Worlds Most Beautiful Girl Boobs HD Pictures


      Indian Pornstars Nude Photos


      Huge Collection Indian Girls Nude Photos With Nice Boobs And Pussy



















      ………… /´¯/)
      ……….,/¯../ /
      ………/…./ /
      …./´¯/’…’/´¯¯.`•¸
      /’/…/…./…..:^.¨¯\
      (‘(…´…´…. ¯_/’…’/
      \……………..’…../
      ..\’…\………. _.•´
      …\…………..(
      ….\…………..\.

      Delete
    2. Oh no! Someone who disagrees with you and voices their opinion. What an injustice am I right? You do realize how whiney and idiotic you sound right? The kiwi farms is a trolling forum that is full of assholes making fun of other assholes for being assholes. Grow up

      Delete
    3. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_xlIAkzdAklU/SxUAjYUc99I/AAAAAAAAjcM/Vj27L5Txjjo/s400/ash.jpg

      Delete
  2. Outstanding work, Ian.

    Between Roosh's appearance on Oz, and the coverage of Clarey's Fury Road boycott, the 'sphere seems to be getting more mainstream coverage then usual.

    Things are getting interesting...

    ReplyDelete
  3. That was well said. I'm glad you took the time to give such a thoughtful answer. Now see, your words are easy to understand, while caustic and angry words, however justified, just drive people away. That is the downfall of feminism too, and why so many women today do not identify as feminists. Men may not feel as if they are being heard or believe women are incapable of empathizing, but many of us have fathers, husbands, sons, and really did start recoiling in horror when fems became very anti-male.

    All in good humor here, but this made me laugh, "You say my idea of feminism is naïve, but I would counter that perhaps your experience of it is limited."

    Said every single feminist, ever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ian:

    I always admire your writing. It’s clear and elegant and professional.

    I also think that you’re wasting your time attempting to engage feminists.

    Shocklee states clearly that feminism was created by, populated by, and provided benefits for women only. To respond that feminists are “unwilling to be accountable” for their damage to men is just agreeing with their principles.

    Also, you’re almost certainly dealing with a motte-and-bailey argument. Shockley is willing to engage you and make concessions on some of feminism’s excesses. My bet is that, once you cease to watch her, she will return to the usual eliminationist rhetoric and the worst excesses of feminist misandry. They’re Social Justice Warriors. That’s what they do.

    You speak of your support of some feminist causes and your first-hand exposure to feminist women. You’re also a talented writer and your favored form of debate is the written one. I have to wonder if this has blinded you to some basic Red Pill watch-what-she-does-not-what-she-says truths.

    It seems like you think of feminists as ideological partisans, using their ideas to inform their behavior. That is how they write and speak.

    What if you modeled feminists as humans whose primary driver was the fear of unworthy men’s sexual advances? Doesn’t this better explain the hysteria (heh) over imagined rape epidemics? The demand for “safe spaces”? The desperate need to cling to abortion rights (what if I’m carrying a beta’s child!)? And the jettisoning of those ideals in the presence of high-value men?

    To use a better literary reference, I think you’re tilting at windmills, thinking that they’re giants.

    It would be lovely if I were wrong and you could engage feminists in productive dialog. But the fact that you’ve really only found one unicorn (and, given motte-and-bailey behavior, probably not even that) makes me think I’m not.

    Great blog, great writing. Let us know when your next book is out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You captured my thoughts exactly!

      Feminists rationalize their self-serving actions however they can and their rationality does not effect their actions. That's WHY they are feminists. No offense Ian but I take this article as a further sign of how soft you have gotten. I highly recommend the following article if you want to read some more revolutionary literature: https://caamib.wordpress.com/

      Delete
  5. Saved and emailed this post to my son. Thanks so much!

    ReplyDelete
  6. "I avoided actual citation and stuck to generalities on purpose, to avoid getting entangled in dueling statistics."

    With that attitude you aren't going to convince anyone who didn't already agree with you. You are acting like a typical woman. If you don't put in the work and supply evidence then why bother? Be the better gender and support your claims.

    That being said I appreciate anyone who hates women as much as I do. Even if this is just fear mongering, you are playing for the right team and I appreciate that. If women had their way modern science, technology, and medicine would crumble.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ian Ironwood is back in true form! Separation makes the heart grown fonder and your past three posts were a true delight.

    The ease in which you articulate mens grievances with feminism almost makes me want to engage in discourse with some feminists myself....almost.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I loved this. It summarizes everything perfectly. You're amazingly eloquent.

    I'm really interested to see any reply. I doubt there will be one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rule of Internet: First one to stop rebutting loses. Usually happens when someone is burned so hard they have to quit the internet. Thanks for post!

      Ian you should get a tumblr you'll get a much better response.

      Delete
  9. Hello Mr. Ironwood (or Dr. Lovemaster as I think of you).

    I just got home from work and decided to see if you had made any posts. Much to my delight I found three. I just finished reading them and I must say they were quite the treat. Great work!

    Since your back I had a question on a somewhat serious matter. What is your opinion on smacking your wife when she's being hysterical? Recently I got caught up some silly drama with some of my blue pill "friends" when I mentioned this. I brought up that some of the most alpha and respectable men of our time (Sean Connery, Sean Penn and Yogi Berra) have advocated the occasional, reasonable smacking of a woman when she needs to be calmed.

    For context, the story is that we were at a bar sitting at a table, just the two of us. A young man came over to my table and complemented my wife's looks (she's a perfect 10 let me tell you, 12 years younger than me). I took this as a sign of respect so I invited him to sit. Before I knew it I was transported to a feminist hell.

    He actually started using terms like "feminism" and "rape-culture" and was trying to impress my wife with his beta arts. My wife was curious and I don't blame her for becoming interested in his malarkey. Feminism is designed to seduce even the most intelligent women. Just as I was getting fed up and about to end my silence and ask this man politely yet firmly to leave, he asked if we would like to head to his place.

    The worst part is that my wife looked into my eyes, and seemed curious about his offer. I smacked her then and there and then grabbed her arm with silent dominance and left the bar. I drove home silently leaving her to reflect on her mistakes. When we got home she could no longer hold back the tears and began apologizing. Now that she submitted control I calmly hugged her and told her that it was okay. Women get confused sometimes and alpha-moves can really help reassure them that they picked the right mate. We had the best sex I've ever had that night.

    Later on I was bragging to my friends and a couple of them got all pissy. One of them even said that I had raped her (which I'm sure you know from experience is something that's fun to laugh at with my wife).

    As the strong patriarch of my family I refuse to let some liberal morons try to take the reigns from me and let my family fall apart. I am the commander of this family, not them.

    I hope you appreciate why I had to post anonymously this time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. While I honor your attempts Ian - I begin to think that engaging with feminists (and women on the whole) is a waste of time. The reason: there appears to be no attention or sympathy for men in our world. Endless attention and sympathy for women, and they cry out for more attention and sympathy in an unending paean - none for men. Simply a cold and selfish indifference. This has been known through the ages.

    From Project Gutenberg's book "The Life Of Florence Nightingale", search in that webpage for "Women have no sympathy":

    (Miss Nightingale to Madame Mohl.) 32 South Street, London, Dec. 13 [1861]. I have read half your book thro' [Madame Récamier], and am immensely charmed by it. But[14] some things I disagree with and more I do not understand. This does not apply to the characters, but to your conclusions, e.g. you say “women are more sympathetic than men.” Now if I were to write a book out of my experience, I should begin Women have no sympathy. Yours is the tradition. Mine is the conviction of experience.
    ...
    Now just look at the degree in which women have sympathy—as far as my experience is concerned. And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. I have lived and slept in the same bed with English Countesses and Prussian Bäuerinnen. No Roman Catholic Supérieure has ever had charge of women of the different creeds that I have had. No woman has excited “passions” among women more than I have. Yet I leave no school behind me. My doctrines have taken no hold among women. Not one of my Crimean following learnt anything from me, or gave herself for one moment after she came home to carry out the lesson of that war or of those hospitals.… No woman that I know has ever appris à apprendre. And I attribute this to want of sympathy. You say somewhere that women have no attention. Yes. And I attribute this to want of sympathy. Nothing makes me so impatient as people complaining of their want of memory. How can you remember what you have never heard?… It makes me mad, the Women's Rights talk about “the want of a field” for them—when I know that I would gladly give £500 a year for a Woman Secretary. And two English Lady Superintendents have told me the same thing. And we can't get one.…

    ReplyDelete
  11. Are you even redpill you laissez-faire plebian? Ian is doing good work. I can't stand when people complain for the sake of complaining and that's what you are doing. "Oh Ian your a fool for not giving up, lets go circlejerk about women being cold bitches." Maybe if you guys devoted this much energy into calling out feminists, our cause would be going somewhere. As is even Roosh is ignoring us. We NEED to get the word out before our movement fades and dies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for sharing the information. It is very useful for my future. keep sharing
    play games friv download baixar facebook

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nature ain't feministic with its limitations manifested as female.speaking true to nature that, its taking two for a birth with female taking 10 months to complete her part while male being never sure how many births he can initiate in just a day. Where is the equality by nature here..haan!! Well, survival instincts indeed made us to self deceive and compromise a lot about certain possibilities around of this identity lacking dynamically static existence forever through awareness. Feminism ought to be platonic if it has to stand for its principle. Physical or pragmatic means must keep the gender female a second lead as a male is compromising a lot in process of procreation :(. Expecting congruence with feminism is just impossible with male being advantageous more by nature.. I mean no hurt but , all blame to nature if something is to be blamed here ��

    ReplyDelete
  14. I just like to see women, and only women, build the Hoover Dam, and purposefully power the western United States in the process.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. without men, civilization would last until the next oil change.

      Delete
  15. Wonderful this is great. wonderful wedding planning ideas Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wow. Well-written response dude. I'd like to see her give an actual, thoughtful, non-accusing counter-argument to that. I somehow doubt that she can.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mr Ironwood

    Having read your blog, and finding much of it compelling, I would like to ask your thoughts on the optimal mating strategies of unicorns.

    Let's imagine a theoretical girl that is raised right; I understand you are raising one. Our little unicorn wants to grow up to be a wife and mother and is taught all the requisite skills and attitudes. She is willing to work hard, to put her career second, to follow, to be pleasant and loyal; she is feminine and sex-positive; and she disapproves of divorce and modern feminism. She is some years away from fully entering the mating marketplace.

    In other words, our girl is a high-quality mate in the making. Will you give her some pointers on finding a high-quality mate - some tips on husband selection, similar to your excellent series on wife selection?

    How does she go about investing her sexual capital wisely? How does she tell your perfectly decent Betas from Peter Pans, or your budding Wolf Alphas from players - especially early in their careers, when it's harder to tell?

    Thank you for giving this some thought.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I would like more information about this, because it is very nice., Thanks for sharing.
    Signature:
    The place to play all unblocked games 77 online. Here you can find every blocked games such as: unblockedgames , unblocked games happy , unblocked games 77 ,

    ReplyDelete
  19. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.
    Signature:
    download baixar facebook movel, Facebook movel, baixar facebook movel. Facebook chat, baixar whatsapp gratis, fazer o download baixar whatsapp para Android, iPhone. Últimas Facebook

    ReplyDelete
  20. It isn't very manly to write a huge wall of text pussy-footing around the issue: The "feminist" movement/label has been hijacked by seeming-psychopaths who have hid behind the movement and done very ugly, very destructive things to men and to society. Since practically no feminists will admit as much, we must assume that they are either a) unaware and thus incompetent or b) aware and thus complicit. In any case "feminism" as a movement has become an opponent to true equality and justice. Until this fact is recognized and reversed by the so-called "true feminists", "feminism" will be an ugly and destructive force that needs to be opposed.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Heads up- have you seen this? http://jezebel.com/asheville-coffee-shop-owners-secretly-ran-misogynistic-1732097139 Might want to make a trip for some coffee soon...

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's really interesting in your post thank you for sharing like this article. Now, Unblocked Games US is here for you to help you where to keep up your best gaming experience for unblocked the available games online for free. , Unblocked Games at School

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ian, you are missed. I look forward to your return.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ian, I hope you're ok.

    This site is far to good to be allowed to fall into disuse. Hope you find the motivation to get it back up and running sometime soon.

    All the best buddy.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Do amazing work for top clients. Create your profile and get hired today. Find rewarding jobs that advance your career. Click to these link and sign up http://www.freelancer.com and change your life forever!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi there, You’ve done a great job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this website….
    agario|agar io|agar.io|agar|agario game|agario skins|agario extended|agario mods|agario|agar io|agario game

    ReplyDelete
  27. I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. It is a great website and nice share
    Signature:
    i like play games happy wheels online and play happy wheels 2 games

    ReplyDelete
  28. Great post, I am happy to find this post very useful for me.
    Open Facebook
    | Science Kombat
    | Science Kombat Game

    ReplyDelete
  29. It has been a year now since this post was written. No more posts, this blog is dead. It was good while it lasted. Bookmark deleted, good luck and God's blessings to you all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I ain't dead. Neither is the blog. Just on hiatus.

      Delete
    2. I'm afraid at this rate I'm going to be going the way of "J.L. the deacon" unless I hear some promise of new content, or your twitter coming back, or something to make it worth my time to keep in the loop. As well spoken as you are, an internet personality who is active content-creator is much more valuable.

      Great moves, keep it up, proud of you.

      Delete
  30. Good you doing alright Mr. Ironwood. May God's Blessings abound in your life with your family. Amen.

    People know you're a busy man and going about your life in the REAL WORLD and not merely the "visual world" as so many people have "devoted" their lives to this artificial environment...

    Thanks for your continuing written works. They are insightful and inspiring.

    God-willing, will stay in contact as well. Amen.

    ~ Sincerely,

    Bro. Jed

    ReplyDelete
  31. Book on my experience in a mystical sect, free downloadable. For the divorcés or those are doing it, indeed if with children, the text contains some precious suggestions. It will help you not to do it, or, if really you must, avoid consequences "too much" worse.

    http://thelittlegodsyndrome.blogspot.it/

    ReplyDelete
  32. Book on my experience in a mystical sect, free downloadable. For the divorcés or those are doing it, indeed if with children, the text contains some precious suggestions. It will help you not to do it, or, if really you must, avoid consequences "too much" worse.

    sua nha dep | tam chong am khoi | da hoa cuong | unionshirts | gearlaunch | teespring | teechip | sunfrogshirts | snorgtees | bonfire funds | promopays | shirt elephant | diversethreads | viralstyle | teezily

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thanks for sharing this quality information with us. I really enjoyed reading.
    slither io | wings io | science kombat | tank trouble 4

    ReplyDelete
  34. I've read the blog (all of it!) I enjoyed it a lot. It's a pity that you stopped writing it.

    Thank you for your work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will be more. Promise. I'll be returning to this medium in the next few months.

      Delete
  35. Welcomes to google terminal keep sharing such ideas in the future as well.
    google snake this was actually EARN TO DIE
    what i was looking for,and i am glad to came here! AGE OF WAR 2
    Hi! I’ve been reading your blog for a while HAPPY WHEELS
    I want you to thank for your time of this wonderful read!!! Slitherio
    Amazing insight you have on this, Slither io This article always blew me BIG FARM
    hotmail sign in | hotmail login
    sign in to hotmail | log in to hotmail

    ReplyDelete
  36. Introducing to you some of the current hot game
    red ball 3 || age of war
    or
    tank trouble || happy wheels
    or
    earn to die
    this is one of the cult game now, a lot of people enjoy playing them :
    slitherio || wingsio
    Welcome to the website which is dedicated to the most funny and addicting
    unblocked game| mills eagles | kids games |
    action games | flash games | stickman games
    gmail sing in

    ReplyDelete
  37. The blog or and best that is extremely useful to keep I can share the ideas. Age Of War 2
    Big Farm | Slitherio | Tank Trouble
    Of the future as this is really what I was looking for, I am very comfortable and pleased to come here. Thank you very much.
    Happy Wheels | Goodgeme Empire | Slither.io

    ReplyDelete
  38. Full Enjoy with Indian and Pakistani Escorts in UAE
    Escorts in UAE
    Sexy Escorts in UAE
    Hot Escorts in UAE
    Whatsapp/Call at: 00971 561472203

    ReplyDelete
  39. Dubai Escorts with Indian and Pakistani Girls in Dubai.
    Dubai Escorts
    Dubai Escort
    LovelyEscorts Dubai
    Fresh Escort Dubai
    Hot Dubai Escorts
    Whatsapp/Call at: +971 564 314 254

    ReplyDelete
  40. Beautiful and Sexy with Indian and Pakistani Escorts in Dubai.
    Escorts in Dubai
    Cute Escorts in Dubai
    Lovel Escorts in Dubai
    Whatsapp/Call at: +971 564 314 254

    ReplyDelete
  41. Woա, sսperb blog layout! How ⅼong have you been Ьlogging
    for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of уour
    web site is wonderful, as well as the content! I has some good article to share with you.. Check List Here
    obat hisprung
    obat turun berok
    zinc tablet anak green world

    ReplyDelete
  42. Nice post and nice try at opening a dialog. She seems very nice and worth talking to more about these issues.

    However, I think as a whole, she answered the question to why this kind of dialog will never work in her second paragraph describing her definition of feminism.

    Broadly, Feminism is an activist movement created to bring mainstream attention to women's issues. How various groups of them go about spreading that message or even some of the specifics of that message is variable from there.

    At that broad definition, Feminism isn't an enemy to men. It formed largely in the early 20th century out of of a need to bring attention to things like the exclusive men's right to vote, etc. These general equalities are things that I think anyone objectively smart can get behind. It's evolved in different ways, some, like Miceala, seem to hold a more "sunny" way of looking at the Feminist cause, and I think if that were the mainstream Feminism, you could probably count me in.

    However, I think the main point I'm trying to make is that I don't think, as men, our fight is with Feminism (even militant Feminism). After all, it's merely an activist group supporting its cause. Everyone has the right to do that, and just because they have made it to the mainstream and started to have some of their goals come to fruition (sometimes at the expense of our own cause), I think everyone has a right to fight for and bring mainstream light to the issues that they hold dear.

    I believe the goal of the manosphere shouldn't be to end Feminism or turn back time. More, it should adapt to the activist nature of society, realize that only through organized activism will our goals meet the mainstream, and that a large reason why men, in general, have been neglected by the mainstream of society is that we let ourselves get painted as the status quo majority. Instead we need to join the activist movement, and draw attention to men's issues. That is how you battle for equality in today's society.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Enjoy With indian and Pakistasni call girls in Dubai.
    indian escorts in dubai
    Whatsapp or call at / +971 564 314 254

    ReplyDelete
  44. You’ve written nice post, I am gonna bookmark this page, thanks for info. I actually appreciate your own position and I will be sure to come back here.
    العاب
    لعبة جاتا
    لعبة صب واى
    لعبة زوما
    لعبة من سيربح المليون

    ReplyDelete
  45. Please come back. I'm still trying to figure out my way around the manopsphere and red pill sites. Your voice makes the most sense to me, compared to everything I've been reading.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Mostly people have all the same things when they are writing academic task or any other writing, especially light music most people like during the writing.

    subway surf , baixar subway surf, subway surf download , download subway surf

    ReplyDelete
  47. Mostly people have all the same things when they are writing academic task or any other writing, especially light music most people like during the writing.

    Snapchat , Snapchat, Snapchat , Snapchat

    ReplyDelete
  48. Life becomes more interesting and wonderful when you share your memorable moments with friends and family through unique photographs. You can create your own unique style impressed with image editing software. And after hours of work stress you can also
    Download Musicas, Baixar Musicas Gratis ,Baixar Musicas Gratis, Baixar Musicas

    ReplyDelete
  49. Life becomes more interesting and wonderful when you share your memorable moments with friends and family through unique photographs. You can create your own unique style impressed with image editing software. And after hours of work stress you can also

    Square Quick
    Square Quick
    Square Quick
    Square Quick
    Square Quick

    ReplyDelete
  50. I really thank you for the valuable info on this great subject and look forward to more great posts. Thanks a lot for enjoying this beauty article with me.

    geometry dash pc, geometry Dash, geometry dash lite, geometry dash play, geometry dash online

    ReplyDelete
  51. Mostly people have all the same things when they are writing academic task or any other writing, especially light music most people like during the writing.
    dream league soccer download , dream league soccer apk , download dream league soccer , dream league soccer

    ReplyDelete
  52. You need to have time to take care of the active. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you.

    banana kong download , banana kong , baixar banana kong , download banana kong

    ReplyDelete
  53. Life becomes more interesting and wonderful when you share your memorable moments with friends and family through unique photographs. You can create your own unique style impressed with image editing software. And after hours of work stress you can also

    whatsapp messenger
    baixar whatsapp
    whatsapp plus
    download whatsapp
    whatsapp baixar

    ReplyDelete
  54. You need to have time to take care of the active. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you.
    Hotmail
    Hotmail Iniciar Sesión
    Iniciar Sesión
    Iniciar Sesión Hotmail
    Iniciar Sesión
    Iniciar Sesión Hotmail

    ReplyDelete
  55. What a nice article is this and I like it very much.Cartincoupon.com

    ReplyDelete